Skip to main content

Teacher for Learning-The Importance & Impact of PK on Learning



The misconception is on the focus of Prior Knowledge as an event rather than a process. Educators like myself often focus on the what a student should already know and how to present the new information. And PK activities are used as straight pathway between the two endpoints; often an after thought. 

But by shifting our understanding that PK may not have a starting point on the pathway due to trauma gaps or cultural miscommunications we can avoid negatively effect students' acquiring new information. 

If PK is seen as an 'either/or' situation, both teacher(s) and student(s) may intentionally or unintentionally assume that the student lacks an ability, or skill-set for a particular subject area. When the educator actual missed an opportunity to present questions that not only triggering students' PK, but spark the students on a personal level. The result can be that students do not immediately recognize how that new information can be applied to: the present task and fail to activate PK, acquire new information, and demonstrate understanding or application in a timely manner. As a result, the impact is that teachers and students are likely to identify the learner as someone who cannot.

However, if the teacher re-frames the concept of prior knowledge from an activity to a process they open students up to autonomously deep-diving they learning could be off the charts. Jeff Haden explored the concepts of learning more and remembering in "Leading Brain Expert on How to Learn Faster and Retain More: Ask Yourself These 3 Questions". Reading this sparked something in me and helped fill the gaps that I expressed earlier on regarding how prior knowledge is misunderstood and misapplied as a concept in education. Haden shares that one of three key pillars to successful learning-personal. A concept a mentor taught me; lessons need to be personal, profound, and positive (3 Ps), students can learn more than I set out to teach them. Haden identifies Jim Kwik's three questions from Limitless: Upgrade Your Brain, Learn Anything Faster, and Unlock Your Exceptional Life. If I adapt these questions and ask myself during the lesson planning process, "How can my students learn this?", "Why must they learn this?", and "When will they use what they've learned?" my lessons, expectations, and outcomes are drastically impacted. My mindset shifts from prior knowledge being either/or to a personal learning process. Furthermore, when I ask my students to answer, "How they can learn/use this?", "Why they must use this?" and "When will they use this?" their mindset shifts from what they don't know how they can learn more faster and use it!

Can your reflect on a lesson plan and identify areas where these 3-questions are asked?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher for Learning-Community

An introductory activity that I really enjoy is a two-part activity. The first part is that using Flipgrid I ask students to introduce themselves. The directions are that they share their name and if they have a nickname that they would like me or their classmates to use (keeping it respectful). Then, I ask them to share what their name means. The students seem to really enjoy sharing and/or finding out what their name means. Many students expand and share if they feel that their name fits them or if they are still trying to grow into it.  The second step of the activity is a writing activity. Students are to compose two letters over the course of a week. The first letter is to their 13 year old self. What do they want the 13 year old version of them to know? What does the 13 year old inside of them need to hear? The second letter is a letter to their future selves. It depends on the grade level I am working with, but typically it is five years in the future. What did they do this aca
Post a Comment
Read more

Curation for Learning-Assessing Online Sources with CRAAP

There is not better time to give a CRAAP than when curating resources for ones self and others. CRAAP stands for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It was developed by California State University-Chico librarians-as if I could possibly LOVE librarians any more than I already did. CRAAP serves as a rubric for determining if resource is current with its information, vital to ones needs, who created it, how accurate or truthful is the information provided, and what the point of the source is. Additionally, I looked over three other rubrics The University of Minnesota's College of Education Open Textbook Library, Faculty Guide for Evaluating OERs by BC Librarians, and Achieve's OER Rubric. Achieve's rubric (2011) was my initial choice, but not applicable for assessing the source I selected. CRAAP worked the best.  I elected to assess Flipgrid. It is a tool that allows for video and podcast discussion format recordings. It is easy for students, parents, and t
Post a Comment
Read more

Curation for Learning-Holy CRAAP!! Extend Activity

  To view my Padlet comments scroll to the far right. Thank you and enjoy!
Post a Comment
Read more